She's been to hell and back. And she's brought you a little stuffed donkey.

Monday, November 22, 2010

Right Royal Whingers

Here are my thoughts on the forthcoming royal wedding.

I don’t really give too much of a fuck one way or the other.

There. That’s told you.

On balance however, I’d say I’m broadly in favour of it, and the whingers and naysayers can piss off.

Now, I’m not a huge fan of the royals by any stretch of the imagination. And don’t even get me started on Diana’s death. For me, its aftermath was like some terrifying Twilight Zone episode where you woke up to find everyone you knew had been replaced by a terrifying race of retarded aliens. And they could read your mind if you didn’t look sad enough. And if they found you were thinking less-than-worshipful thoughts about the People’s Princess, they’d zap you dead on the spot.

Your parents. Your friends. The man in the corner shop. Absolutely everyone you knew had had their brains scooped out and replaced by these special needs pod people.

And in desperation, you thought you were going to take the matter to the government.

And then the prime minister came on the news, and you saw he was one of them too.

Brrrr.

But Diana aside, I generally view the royal family in much the same way as I view, say, coffee tables. I’m not going to rave about them, or worship them, or go out of my way for a fleeting glimpse of one. They’re just there.

Yet I’m grudgingly willing to concede that they have a place in a well-ordered universe. And that - through no great gifts of their own - the world would be a slightly worse place without them.

You want President Cameron and First Lady SamCam living in the British White House and flying about in Air Force One?

Really?


From where I stand, the cost of the Royals - and even of the Wills-and-Kate wedding - is ultimately pretty small beans compared to the war in Iraq and bailing out Ireland and buying new nukes from America and God only knows what other shit we have to pay for out of our taxes whether we want it or not.

Now, I haven’t got the exact figures to hand any more than the Guardian-dwelling royal hatas, but – in the spirit of democracy and social equality they purport to so admire – I can only conclude that my unfounded back-of-a-fag-packet bullshit is just as good as theirs.

And I’m just as entitled to make shit up I understand nothing about, with no economic background or training whatsoever.

And so I’ll say with professorial certainty that the substantial investment in the royal wedding will be recouped several times over from tourists.

Because it just will be.

It just will, all right?

So shut up.

Admittedly, I have no earthly way of knowing what the costs and benefits really will be, and how they’ll really tally up on the day. But that’s much like the Zoe Williamses and Polly Toynbees and Tanya Golds of this world, and they don’t let a little thing like overwhelming ignorance stop them from yacking on like they know it all.

(Incidentally, their class-based bitterness and power-to-the-people schtick might be a bit more convincing if it didn’t come from a bunch of spoilt rich twats who walked into their cushy media jobs without breaking a sweat because Daddy went to Ampleforth with the editor.

Day boy, mind you. None of your toffs at the Guardian.*)

But I do know for sure that tourists eat this shit up like ice cream, and they’ll be all over a photogenic royal wedding like a tramp on chips.

Fact is, that’s what tourists like about England, and it’s pretty much all that tourists like about England. Like it or not.

To the watching, hotel-booking, open-topped-bus-tour-taking world, we’re a pretty little anachronistic Lilliput Lane of a country. A land of cream teas and cucumber sandwiches and cricket matches and gentle unworldly middle-aged ladies cycling to church on a Sunday morning. Royalty running through the entire fabric of our society like the words on a stick of Brighton rock.

Oddly, I can’t think of any country, anywhere, whose public image is so wildly out of kilter with its actual reality.

I always feel a bit sorry for poor old Buddy and Mary Sue Plaskett of Nebraska, who’ve spent their life savings on a once-in-a-lifetime European tour,

They’ll go to Paris, home of the elegant rude snooty type, and they’ll almost immediately meet an elegant rude snooty type.

And they’ll go to Italy, home of the oily charmer with the major Madonna/whore complex, and they’ll almost immediately meet an oily charmer with a major Madonna/whore complex.

And they’ll go to Ireland, home of the amiable twinkly-eyed drunk who never shuts up. And they’ll almost immediately meet an amiable twinkly-eyed drunk who never shuts up.

And finally, they’ll come over to good old Blighty. Home of the diffident-yet-charming well-spoken young gentleman with floppy hair, a slight stammer, and a severe yet oddly endearing case of emotional constipation.

And they’ll almost immediately meet a vomiting chav scumbag threatening to glass them in the face for looking at them funny.

Talk about false advertising.

It’s as if our national archetype – a strange, precious and delicate creature ill-adapted to the brutal realities of the modern world – actually keeled over and dropped dead some time in the late 1960s.

But we didn’t dare go public with this news for fear of completely destroying our tourist industry.

So whenever the tourists showed up, we gamely pretended it was still alive like the titular character in Weekend At Bernie’s. Buckingham Palace and all it implies is like the stick propping good old Bernie up - and the cunning little mechanism making his cold dead hand wave at the camera-snapping crowds.

You’d think that sooner or later, someone’s going to notice that the old fellow’s in the advanced stages of decomposition – and that his nose fell off some time in the mid-80s.

But maybe not, because – as any Londoner could tell you - foreign tourists aren’t the brightest little buttons in the box.

Keep him at a safe enough distance from the crowds, and his greenish pallor just looks like a bit of a hangover.

Still, if we’re going to have a royal family - and we’d haemorrhage tourists if we ever chucked ours out – it makes sense to have a proper one. Those foreign royals having professional jobs and riding round on bikes and watching the pennies are just shit. Do it or don’t do it.

Want to know what you call an old-fashioned, extravagant, wasteful monarchy?

A tautology.

But people who hate the royals have gone into serious overdrive on the subject of the royal wedding. Snobbery. Anachronism. Social inequality. Discriminatory class system. Blah blah blah blah blah.

Americans claim this snobbish preoccupation with social class and background is an exclusively English concern, and they don’t have it round their neck of the woods at all.

And credit where it’s due, I dare say they’re right.

This is why it’s such a commonplace event for the Harvard-bound WASPish Boston Brahmins to enter into serious relationships with the manky-toothed single teenage mothers on welfare.

Happens all the time in the classless States.

If I had a penny for every time I’d read about the impending nuptials of, say, Bruce Winthrop III and LaKeeSha Brice, I’d be a rich lady by now.

This classless ethos and effortless social fluidity must also be why 'not-your-typical-horsey-looking-princess-in-everything-but-name-at-all' Chelsea Clinton married a mullet-sporting trailer-dweller called Billy Bob Scratchett. Whose hobbies included demolition derbies, petty crime and working as a dishwasher at the Crab Shack - and who was descended from a penniless family of part-time rabbit thieves.

And why their union was marked by a simple, inexpensive ceremony of democratic modesty and communal inclusiveness. To which all of American’s socially-equal citizens, rich and poor alike, were warmly welcomed with open arms.

*Snork*

Simple fact. Snobbery, class structures and social inequality are in existence absolutely fucking everywhere that sentient beings exist.

This applies whether you’re living in a monarchy, a presidency, a dictatorship, a grimly prophetic communist dystopia or a whimsical distant planet inhabited by talking shoes.

Christ, there are probably chimpanzees sneering at other chimpanzees for eating their bananas funny and living in a crap tree.

I’m filing this inconvenient little fact, along with ‘men like sex more than women’ in the cabinet marked ‘that’s just bloody life. Don’t like it, tough shit.’

So simpering, cloying congratulations to Kate and Wills anyway, may they be very happy in the future and blah blah blah. Although apparently, Prince Harry won’t be going to the wedding.

It’s family only.

J x

* Like Ed Miliband attacking the PM for being upper-class, overprivileged and hopelessly out of touch with society’s dark underbelly. Fuck, yeah. While the young David Cameron was trying on his first top hat for Eton, the Miliband krew were selling crack on the mean streets of Primrose Hill. In the ghetto, it all come down to how you carry it, yo. Shit be real.

8 comments:

Toni said...

Another winning post juliette. Like you I couldn't care less about the Royal wedding, but then I am a Scot. You are absolutely correct that the tourists love this shit and I bet the wedding turns over a better profit margin than the Olympics. Even better it gives the papers something to write about apart from the dismal state of our economy. I love the stories that are already appearing that suggest marriage ceremonies will increase as a result, yeah Royal weddings work out so well the first thing I am going to do is marry my stalker. Mind you the stalker can't stand the royal family, she is a citizen of a republic, although I did point out that the lifestyle of some of her relatives would make the Royal family blush, The queen doesn't even have a yacht any more although I don't suppose she collects coupons in the Sun for booze cruises to Calais. I actually love seeing the Queen on the box when she meets visiting dignitaries. You always have the idea that she is wondering who these dreadful people are. She must think Berlusconi and Sarkozy are a pair of pimps or that old Phil has some unpaid gambling debts. She did seem rather non-plussed when she met Obama and his wife. Americans may deny they have a class system and I suppose to an extent its true - Americans will always love money most so you can fake it if your rich enough. However, all that Ivy league crap and my family came over in the Mayflower - what could be more elitist than that?

I am sure Harry will get an invite just told to leave his Nazi uniform in Windsor.

jd said...

Couldn't agree more on Diana. Fortunately I was out of London and that week, and all my family were of a similar view - wondering when the British population had been replaced by a bunch of wailing foreign-types.

As for the Royals more generally, I don't really give two hoots, but as heads of state go, Queenie does a decent job. She's cheaper than a Chirac, and because she is essentially non-political, she isn't a competitor to the PM. You don't get the mess that, say, France had been Mitterrand was President and Chirac PM.

Anonymous said...

Lots of the time I don't agree with you. This is not one of those times. The royal wedding is fine but it's nothing to do with me. Although I do wish good luck to the happy couple as I would to any other random pair.

As you say Americans are fully aware of social class/division. Similarly, Australians. The first question is always about where you live. The suburb name is rarely sufficient information-people around these parts like to have a road name in order see exactly where you are in the social hierarchy. I have been asked, on more than one occasion if I live in the 'golden triangle'. Apparently this is a network streets where all the houses cost several million dollars. The next question is "how do you make a crust?"

So my English friends. You are not alone. The average Aussie is deeply conservative and very preoccupied with money. At least in England you can pretend to have fallen on hard times. Genteel poverty is acceptable especially if one's accent is refined. Believe me, it ain't here.

Jackart said...

For the record, I was a boarder, and the day-boys study was occasionally pressed into service as a boxing ring. (the spectators could stand on the benches round the side of the room.

The English Gentleman has always liked a scrap too, with rules, mind, which is why we invented rugby and boxing.

Rightwinggit said...

Now, THAT was funny.

Toni said...

You know juliette, I was watching some comedy program on iPlayer the other night called Miranda. It made me think of you instantly. I don't mean to be rude because the Miranda in question is fat and unattractive, which I am sure you are not. She does however have some former classmates who are the kind of dim witted sloany types I imagine you went to school with. I have a great deal of sympathy with you because I was probably the poorest person in my school, but as I have said before my school wasn't like a normal school, so all the pupils were united against our rather fearsome staff.

Nuclear Girl said...

My sentiments entirely, J, and at least we get an extra day off work!

Completely off topic - I saw "Pan's Labyrinth" for the first time at the weekend and I totally see what you mean about Captain Vidal. I've been drooling over him ever since, bought the DVD so I can drool some more. OMG those leather gloves, those jackboots, that uniform! Purr!

juliette said...

JD, Anon, Rightwinggit - thanks very much, very glad I'm not alone in my non-anarchy-in-the-UK approach!

Toni - funny you should say that about Miranda, as I can say for a stone fact I'm as different to her physically, emotionally and psychologically as it's possible for one person to be different from another, and still belong to the same species (a bit like chihuhahuas and great danes!) God I hate her lame, stupid programme. God she's fucking unfunny and annoying. God if I met someone like that in real life I'd want to punch her in the face. But I won't take it reminding you of me personally :-)

Nuclear Girl - damn, I am so, so glad it's not just me!! Vidal in Pan's Labyrinth is _absolutely fucking stunning_. I honestly don't think I ever fancied a fictional character more in my entire life. Don't even get me started on those black leather gloves (*drifts into thoughtful daydream, ponders pros and cons of cold shower*)

I'm not even going to mention the bit where he's got the housekeeper in that outhouse. That scene would have played a whole lot differently if I'd been directing it. Could have taken the movie in a whole new direction (actually, for the sake of narrative coherence, it's probably best that Guillermo del Toro's a straight bloke, as three and a half hours of disturbing SM porn three quarters of the way through the movie might have disrupted the flow somewhat :-)

Well, Sylvia Plath did say 'every woman adores a fascist.' So maybe it's not just us two being sick fucks, LOL :-)

J x